You need to read the whole Storm's article for context, but I agree with him and loved this paragraph...
My question...is this: How can we claim to be "together"
or "united" for the sake of the gospel and turn away a brother or
sister from the very expression and proclamation of that gospel that is
so central to the life and testimony of the church? What does
this prohibition say to the world around us? What must they think of
our professed "togetherness" or "unity" when the elements of the
Eucharist would be withheld from a brother such as Ligon Duncan?
Grudem previously argued for "allowing both views of baptism [i.e.,
paedobaptism and credobaptism] to be taught and practiced in
denominations on both sides of the question." Grudem has since changed
his mind.
Evidently, Wayne is not so sure any more that we should make the effort
to overcome the divisions among evangelicals for the sake of welcoming
true brothers and sisters as members in the local church. I think his
first edition was closer to the biblical balance.
The word “bridge” does not occur in the Bible. There may be tworeasons. One is that God doesn’t build bridges, he divides seas. The
other is that usually his people must pass through the deadly currents
of suffering and death, not simply ride over them. “When you pass
through the waters, I will be with you; and through the rivers, they
shall not overwhelm you” (Isaiah 43:2). They may drown you. But I will
be with you in life and death.
Marcus Aurelius believed that the course of wisdom consisted of
learning to trade easy pleasures for more complex and challenging ones.
I worry about a culture that bit by bit trades off the challenging
pleasures of art for the easy comforts of entertainment. And that is
exactly what is happening—not just in the media, but in our schools and
civic life.
Entertainment promises us a predictable pleasure—humor, thrills,
emotional titillation, or even the odd delight of being vicariously
terrified. It exploits and manipulates who we are rather than
challenges us with a vision of who we might become. A child who spends
a month mastering Halo or NBA Live on Xbox has not been
awakened and transformed the way that child would be spending the time rehearsing a play or learning to draw.
[...]
Art is an irreplaceable way of understanding and expressing the
world—equal to but distinct from scientific and conceptual methods. Art
addresses us in the fullness of our being—simultaneously speaking to
our intellect, emotions, intuition, imagination, memory, and physical
senses. There are some truths about life that can be expressed only as
stories, or songs, or images.
Art delights, instructs, consoles. It educates our emotions. And it
remembers. As Robert Frost once said about poetry, "It is a way of
remembering that which it would impoverish us to forget." Art awakens,
enlarges, refines, and restores our humanity. You don't outgrow art.
The same work can mean something different at each stage of your life.
A good book changes as you change.
The policy addresses an ongoing SBC debate. Baptistshave championed alcohol abstinence since the late 1800s, but a growing
number want the SBC to reexamine the issue, said Timothy George, dean
of Beeson Divinity School.
"There is growing
discontent, people saying that we shouldn't be mandating things that
aren't spoken clearly about in Scripture," George said. "It's hard to
argue that the Bible requires total abstinence."
I can't find a way to link to it directly, but you can read Tim Keller's "Talking About Idolatry in a Postmodern Age" at the Gospel Coalition site. I don't think I have it linked elsewhere.
Personally, I don't understand why sites are built so you can't link directly to everything. But at least it's there. Maybe they will eventually add permalinks to everything.
God intends us to penetrate the world. Christian salt has no business to remain snugly in elegant little ecclesiastical salt cellars; our place is to be rubbed into the secular community, as salt is rubbed into meat, to stop it going bad. And when society does go bad, we Christians tend to throw up our hands in pious horror and reproach the non-Christian world; but should we not rather reproach ourselves? One can hardly blame unsalted meat for going bad. It cannot do anything else. The real question to ask is: Where is the salt?
Allelon - "a movement of missional leaders" -- They have a website which has a number of resources, but I'm really loving Alan Roxburgh's netcast (especially the audio podcast) the most. There are things said that I don't like or agree with, but in general this is a great podcast for seeing the emerging missional church for what it is and what it claims to be in different locations. The interview with Steve Taylor is really great.
Theology Unplugged (TUP) is a podcast by some Dallas Seminary profs. They say, "The uniqueness of
TUP is that we speak on theological issues of the day with clarity,
honesty, and openness. TUP allows the listener to make informed
judgments on the most important theological issues today." Their seven part series on the emerging church is a great example of that. I'm through the first three episodes and I'm pretty shocked at how well they do in trying to understand the emerging church. Well worth hearing. (HT: Internet Monk Radio)
One of my recurring frustrations with recent debates in the Reformed
world is a widespread failure of theological imagination. Too many seem
to operate on the assumption that we have everything already figured
out; we have all possible categories and positions ready to hand. All
we need do is deploy these categories on whatever happens our way.
It'll fit, Procrustes says.
Thus, it is seriously proposed that someone is either on the road to
Rome or the Road to Geneva - with no possibility of a third (or fourth,
or fifth) destination, with no possibility that there might be
something in between (though in between is where much of the Christian
world lives). And if I suggest that we Reformed might still have
something to learn from the Bible about justification, then I must be
Rabbinic or Roman Catholic - there simply is no other alternative.
Recently I was browsing in my local bookstore. I picked up a bookwith lots of promises on the cover about what success will come if I
implement the teachings of this book into my work. I brought it home
only to add it to a bookshelf loaded with books with similar promises.
Wherever
you work, there will always be another book to read, another leader to
emulate, or another leadership model to adopt. If you want to succeed,
there is no shortage of books telling you what to do. But how can we
know if the success described in these books is what God considers
success? How do we define godly success for our businesses and churches
and schools?